2012 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2

Information Configuration Pictures News Price Oil consumption Comments

Price: $63,170

Engine:6.2 V-8

MPG:14 City / 18 Hwy

0-60:6.7 seconds

color:

Cadillac >> Escalade >> 2012 Base 4x2

The Cadillac Escalade is a large, luxurious SUV that delivers performance and style. Classy and powerful, it looks great for a night on the town or can haul everything needed for a weekend getaway.

Available as a 4x2 or 4x4 the Escalade is powered by a 403-hp 6.2-liter V8 with Active Fuel Management and E85 compatibility, mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. Standard equipment includes a power liftgate, stability control, remote start, Bluetooth compatibility, a rear-view camera and side curtain airbags. Some options are Magnetic Ride Control and 22-inch chrome wheels. The Platinum Edition takes style and innovation to a whole new level with standard equipment such as LED headlights, power running boards, and a rear seat entertainment system with two monitors.

The 2012 Cadillac Escalade carries over from 2011.

Competitive models

2011 Toyota Sequoia Platinum 5.7L V8 4dr 4x4

$61,305

2012 Volkswagen Touareg Hybrid Base 4dr All-wheel Drive 4MOTION

$61,410

2012 Infiniti QX56 Base 4dr 4x4

$61,800

2011 Lincoln Navigator L Base 4dr 4x4

$62,695

2012 GMC Yukon Hybrid Denali 4x4

$62,825

2011 Porsche Cayenne S 4dr All-wheel Drive

$64,400

All Trims

6.0 Liter
Model(23)	Mark	Price	Engine type	MPG	Compare
2012 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid Base 4x2		$73,850	V-8	20 City / 23 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid Base 4x4		$76,400	V-8	20 City / 23 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid Platinum Edition 4x2		$83,295	V-8	20 City / 23 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid Platinum Edition 4x4		$85,845	V-8	20 City / 23 Hwy	add to compare
6.2 Liter
2012 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$63,170	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Base All-wheel Drive		$65,720	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Luxury 4x2		$67,395	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Luxury All-wheel Drive		$69,945	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Premium 4x2		$71,675	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Premium All-wheel Drive		$74,225	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Platinum Edition 4x2		$79,945	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade Platinum Edition All-wheel Drive		$82,495	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade ESV Base 4x2		$65,770	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade ESV Base All-wheel Drive		$68,320	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade ESV Luxury 4x2		$69,995	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade ESV Luxury All-wheel Drive		$72,545	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade ESV Premium 4x2		$74,875	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade ESV Premium All-wheel Drive		$77,425	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade ESV Platinum Edition 4x2		$82,545	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade ESV Platinum Edition All-wheel Drive		$85,095	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade EXT Base All-wheel Drive		$63,060	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade EXT Luxury All-wheel Drive		$67,250	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

2012 Cadillac Escalade EXT Premium All-wheel Drive		$69,640	V-8	13 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

Other Escalade Years

5.3 Liter
Model(14)	Mark	Price	Engine type	MPG	Compare
2004 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$52,635	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare
2002 Cadillac Escalade Base 4dr 4x2		$48,735	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare
2003 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$51,055	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare
5.7 Liter
1999 Cadillac Escalade Base 4dr 4x4		$46,225	V-8	12 City / 16 Hwy	add to compare
2000 Cadillac Escalade Base 4dr 4x4		$46,225	V-8	12 City / 16 Hwy	add to compare
6.0 Liter
2006 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$53,850	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare
2005 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$53,850	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare
6.2 Liter
2012 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$63,170	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare
2011 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$63,455	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare
2010 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$62,495	V-8	14 City / 20 Hwy	add to compare
2009 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$62,205	V-8	12 City / 19 Hwy	add to compare
2008 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$55,990	V-8	12 City / 19 Hwy	add to compare
2007 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$54,670	V-8	13 City / 20 Hwy	add to compare
2013 Cadillac Escalade Base 4x2		$63,170	V-8	14 City / 18 Hwy	add to compare

220.246.38.*

Summary:: It worries me that the dionrimicatsry foundations of this Bill have been glossed over in much of this debate. This policy clearly states that a child without a serious illness' must be automatically preferred to a one that does have one (or indeed, a risk of developing one). This is clear discrimination and implies that a Deaf life is one not worth living. If this legislation is passed a precedent of statutory interpretation will have been established – that deafness is indeed a ‘serious illness’. In future what other ‘conditions’ may be eradicated in this way? This medical conception of deafness is a narrow-minded denial of the richness and value of Deaf culture and community.Deaf persons have many unique qualities to offer the rest of the world – can many hearing people claim to be able to attend an international conference and be able to communicate with any person of any nationality? Deaf persons can through adapting their beautiful and flexible language. Far from being isolated and lonely individuals, each Deaf person may become a member of a vast global community if they wish to do so.Clause 14 should be recognised for what it is – yet another thinly veiled attempt to eradicate Deaf persons, motivated by economics. The brave parents at the heart of this debate are not seeking to ‘engineer’ a ‘designer baby’. The embryo is deaf, it already exists. They are simply saying that they would deeply love and cherish a child that others may see as disabled. What is so very terrible about that?

Strong point:: It worries me that the dionrimicatsry foundations of this Bill have been glossed over in much of this debate. This policy clearly states that a child without a serious illness' must be automatically preferred to a one that does have one (or indeed, a risk of developing one). This is clear discrimination and implies that a Deaf life is one not worth living. If this legislation is passed a precedent of statutory interpretation will have been established – that deafness is indeed a ‘serious illness’. In future what other ‘conditions’ may be eradicated in this way? This medical conception of deafness is a narrow-minded denial of the richness and value of Deaf culture and community.Deaf persons have many unique qualities to offer the rest of the world – can many hearing people claim to be able to attend an international conference and be able to communicate with any person of any nationality? Deaf persons can through adapting their beautiful and flexible language. Far from being isolated and lonely individuals, each Deaf person may become a member of a vast global community if they wish to do so.Clause 14 should be recognised for what it is – yet another thinly veiled attempt to eradicate Deaf persons, motivated by economics. The brave parents at the heart of this debate are not seeking to ‘engineer’ a ‘designer baby’. The embryo is deaf, it already exists. They are simply saying that they would deeply love and cherish a child that others may see as disabled. What is so very terrible about that?

Weak point:: It worries me that the dionrimicatsry foundations of this Bill have been glossed over in much of this debate. This policy clearly states that a child without a serious illness' must be automatically preferred to a one that does have one (or indeed, a risk of developing one). This is clear discrimination and implies that a Deaf life is one not worth living. If this legislation is passed a precedent of statutory interpretation will have been established – that deafness is indeed a ‘serious illness’. In future what other ‘conditions’ may be eradicated in this way? This medical conception of deafness is a narrow-minded denial of the richness and value of Deaf culture and community.Deaf persons have many unique qualities to offer the rest of the world – can many hearing people claim to be able to attend an international conference and be able to communicate with any person of any nationality? Deaf persons can through adapting their beautiful and flexible language. Far from being isolated and lonely individuals, each Deaf person may become a member of a vast global community if they wish to do so.Clause 14 should be recognised for what it is – yet another thinly veiled attempt to eradicate Deaf persons, motivated by economics. The brave parents at the heart of this debate are not seeking to ‘engineer’ a ‘designer baby’. The embryo is deaf, it already exists. They are simply saying that they would deeply love and cherish a child that others may see as disabled. What is so very terrible about that?

08-16 20:36

: 60

Reply(0)
Support(0)
Against(0)

212.68.101.*

Summary:: It worries me that the dionrimicatsry foundations of this Bill have been glossed over in much of this debate. This policy clearly states that a child without a serious illness' must be automatically preferred to a one that does have one (or indeed, a risk of developing one). This is clear discrimination and implies that a Deaf life is one not worth living. If this legislation is passed a precedent of statutory interpretation will have been established – that deafness is indeed a ‘serious illness’. In future what other ‘conditions’ may be eradicated in this way? This medical conception of deafness is a narrow-minded denial of the richness and value of Deaf culture and community.Deaf persons have many unique qualities to offer the rest of the world – can many hearing people claim to be able to attend an international conference and be able to communicate with any person of any nationality? Deaf persons can through adapting their beautiful and flexible language. Far from being isolated and lonely individuals, each Deaf person may become a member of a vast global community if they wish to do so.Clause 14 should be recognised for what it is – yet another thinly veiled attempt to eradicate Deaf persons, motivated by economics. The brave parents at the heart of this debate are not seeking to ‘engineer’ a ‘designer baby’. The embryo is deaf, it already exists. They are simply saying that they would deeply love and cherish a child that others may see as disabled. What is so very terrible about that?

Strong point:: It worries me that the dionrimicatsry foundations of this Bill have been glossed over in much of this debate. This policy clearly states that a child without a serious illness' must be automatically preferred to a one that does have one (or indeed, a risk of developing one). This is clear discrimination and implies that a Deaf life is one not worth living. If this legislation is passed a precedent of statutory interpretation will have been established – that deafness is indeed a ‘serious illness’. In future what other ‘conditions’ may be eradicated in this way? This medical conception of deafness is a narrow-minded denial of the richness and value of Deaf culture and community.Deaf persons have many unique qualities to offer the rest of the world – can many hearing people claim to be able to attend an international conference and be able to communicate with any person of any nationality? Deaf persons can through adapting their beautiful and flexible language. Far from being isolated and lonely individuals, each Deaf person may become a member of a vast global community if they wish to do so.Clause 14 should be recognised for what it is – yet another thinly veiled attempt to eradicate Deaf persons, motivated by economics. The brave parents at the heart of this debate are not seeking to ‘engineer’ a ‘designer baby’. The embryo is deaf, it already exists. They are simply saying that they would deeply love and cherish a child that others may see as disabled. What is so very terrible about that?

Weak point:: It worries me that the dionrimicatsry foundations of this Bill have been glossed over in much of this debate. This policy clearly states that a child without a serious illness' must be automatically preferred to a one that does have one (or indeed, a risk of developing one). This is clear discrimination and implies that a Deaf life is one not worth living. If this legislation is passed a precedent of statutory interpretation will have been established – that deafness is indeed a ‘serious illness’. In future what other ‘conditions’ may be eradicated in this way? This medical conception of deafness is a narrow-minded denial of the richness and value of Deaf culture and community.Deaf persons have many unique qualities to offer the rest of the world – can many hearing people claim to be able to attend an international conference and be able to communicate with any person of any nationality? Deaf persons can through adapting their beautiful and flexible language. Far from being isolated and lonely individuals, each Deaf person may become a member of a vast global community if they wish to do so.Clause 14 should be recognised for what it is – yet another thinly veiled attempt to eradicate Deaf persons, motivated by economics. The brave parents at the heart of this debate are not seeking to ‘engineer’ a ‘designer baby’. The embryo is deaf, it already exists. They are simply saying that they would deeply love and cherish a child that others may see as disabled. What is so very terrible about that?

08-16 20:35